Another option...
May 1, 2008 - 11am Central time zone
Reviewer: Daniel from Toronto
That scenario might also be implemented with advanced replication from one site to another, with
refreshes scheduled at convenient times and intervals.
Followup May 1, 2008 - 11am Central time zone:
ummm, what scenario - they gave NO scenario.
I hate replication...
replication
May 1, 2008 - 5pm Central time zone
Reviewer: Radoslav Golian
>> I hate replication...
Why do you hate it?
I'm just curious :).
Followup May 1, 2008 - 9pm Central time zone:
why do it
it adds complexity
it is almost always implemented wrong (what, we needed to have update conflict resolution routines, we needed to design for that, we needed to think about this - it should just happen)
it is almost always not needed - one case I can think where it is - on a submarine. In the year 2008, replication should die a quick death.
distributed is distributed complexity. It is not easy, it takes LOTS of resources. It takes a ton of planning. It take a lot of design.
and people do not do that.
Will PX work across the DB link from 9i to 10G?
May 2, 2008 - 6am Central time zone
Reviewer: Naresh Bhandare from Cyprus
hi Tom,
Will Parallel execution work across a DB link from 9i to 10G? (It would be useful for copying large
tables as a one time operation for data migrations).
It does work from 9i to 9i.
Thanks,
Naresh
Followup May 2, 2008 - 7am Central time zone:
it'll will serialize over the dblink
you can run a parallel query on the remote site, you can run a parallel insert on the local site, however the data will traverse one pipe over the network. (even in 9i, meaning, I see it being of limited benefit in almost all cases - with the exception of a remote parallel query when you are joining or aggregating)
Inserting data directly from 9i to 10g", version 9.2.0.1.0
May 5, 2008 - 2am Central time zone
Reviewer: Deepak Singh from Dubai, UAE
Thnx tom,
As suggested i'm gonna change the design & make nessesary amendments to make 2 systems work
independently.
|